<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Marcy Dermansky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcydermansky.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcydermansky.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Marie in the 2011 Tournament of Books by Tweets that mention Bad Marie in the 2011 Tournament of Books Â« Marcy Dermansky -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/2011/02/09/bad-marie-in-the-2011-tournament-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-51700</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bad Marie in the 2011 Tournament of Books Â« Marcy Dermansky -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/?p=687#comment-51700</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Trident Media Group, EMB Flip. EMB Flip said: Bad Marie in the 2011 Tournament of Books: Bad Marie was selected by The Morning News as one of the sixteen boo... http://bit.ly/guK8V1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Trident Media Group, EMB Flip. EMB Flip said: Bad Marie in the 2011 Tournament of Books: Bad Marie was selected by The Morning News as one of the sixteen boo&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/guK8V1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/guK8V1</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Bloggers Have Spoken by Blogs The Third &#171; Marcy Dermansky</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/2010/07/09/the-bloggers-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-51558</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs The Third &#171; Marcy Dermansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/?p=288#comment-51558</guid>
		<description>[...] The Third  September 21st, 2010 After two previous installments, here is the latest praise for Bad Marie from around the web: &#8220;Oddly and completely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Third  September 21st, 2010 After two previous installments, here is the latest praise for Bad Marie from around the web: &#8220;Oddly and completely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Reviews Keep Coming by Blogs The Third &#171; Marcy Dermansky</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/2010/08/10/the-reviews-keep-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-51557</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs The Third &#171; Marcy Dermansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/?p=345#comment-51557</guid>
		<description>[...] The Third  September 21st, 2010 After two previous installments, here is the latest praise for Bad Marie from around the web: &#8220;Oddly and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Third  September 21st, 2010 After two previous installments, here is the latest praise for Bad Marie from around the web: &#8220;Oddly and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Marie by HTMLGIANT</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/badmarie/comment-page-1/#comment-51529</link>
		<dc:creator>HTMLGIANT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/?page_id=46#comment-51529</guid>
		<description>[...] you all read Bad Marie by Marcy Demansky yet? It&#8217;s amazing and you should go get this book immediately so you can let it kick you in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you all read Bad Marie by Marcy Demansky yet? It&#8217;s amazing and you should go get this book immediately so you can let it kick you in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Marie by On Book Reviews and &#8220;Literary&#8221; and &#8220;Popular&#8221; Fiction : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/badmarie/comment-page-1/#comment-51469</link>
		<dc:creator>On Book Reviews and &#8220;Literary&#8221; and &#8220;Popular&#8221; Fiction : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/?page_id=46#comment-51469</guid>
		<description>[...] Is the Times book review unduly focused on male writers from Brooklyn?Â Â  Possibly!Â  It would require a much more systematic analysis than I&#8217;m willing to do.Â Â Â  I can say that coincidentally four of the five works of fiction I&#8217;ve read most recently &#8212; Marcy Dermansky&#8217;s very well-turned noir Bad Marie, Anne Lamont&#8217;s Imperfect Birds, Lorrie Moore&#8217;s typically exceptional A Gate at the Stairs, and Alice Munro&#8217;s Selected Stories &#8212; happen to have been written by women.Â Â  All but the first*, for what it&#8217;s worth, received positive notices in the Times. Munro is another good example of the fact that major work can appeal to a broad audience, and the first two blur lines betwen &#8220;literary&#8221; and &#8220;genre&#8221; fiction, but I if I had to guess I don&#8217;t think the attention paid by the Times to female &#8220;literary&#8221; novelists is especially low.Â Â Â  Scanning my shelves for other recent favorites, I would also say that other important authors such as Enright, Gaitskill, Zadie Smith have also gotten a reasonable level of engagement.Â Â Â  Whether it&#8217;s high enough is a matter of judgment, but at a minimum I don&#8217;t see the kind of easy prima facie case you would have against, say, the Washington Post op-ed page.Â  [*Dermansky, generously responding to my inquiry, notes that Bad Marie was discussed in this Times article and did receive a variety of other prominent notices.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is the Times book review unduly focused on male writers from Brooklyn?Â Â  Possibly!Â  It would require a much more systematic analysis than I&#8217;m willing to do.Â Â Â  I can say that coincidentally four of the five works of fiction I&#8217;ve read most recently &#8212; Marcy Dermansky&#8217;s very well-turned noir Bad Marie, Anne Lamont&#8217;s Imperfect Birds, Lorrie Moore&#8217;s typically exceptional A Gate at the Stairs, and Alice Munro&#8217;s Selected Stories &#8212; happen to have been written by women.Â Â  All but the first*, for what it&#8217;s worth, received positive notices in the Times. Munro is another good example of the fact that major work can appeal to a broad audience, and the first two blur lines betwen &#8220;literary&#8221; and &#8220;genre&#8221; fiction, but I if I had to guess I don&#8217;t think the attention paid by the Times to female &#8220;literary&#8221; novelists is especially low.Â Â Â  Scanning my shelves for other recent favorites, I would also say that other important authors such as Enright, Gaitskill, Zadie Smith have also gotten a reasonable level of engagement.Â Â Â  Whether it&#8217;s high enough is a matter of judgment, but at a minimum I don&#8217;t see the kind of easy prima facie case you would have against, say, the Washington Post op-ed page.Â  [*Dermansky, generously responding to my inquiry, notes that Bad Marie was discussed in this Times article and did receive a variety of other prominent notices.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Marie by Fictionaut Five: Marcy Dermansky - Fictionaut Blog</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/badmarie/comment-page-1/#comment-51331</link>
		<dc:creator>Fictionaut Five: Marcy Dermansky - Fictionaut Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/?page_id=46#comment-51331</guid>
		<description>[...] Dermansky is the author of Bad Marie (just released) and Twins (2005). Her short stories have been published in numerous literary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dermansky is the author of Bad Marie (just released) and Twins (2005). Her short stories have been published in numerous literary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New York Times Editorâ€™s Choice Pick by jürgen fauth&#8217;s muckworld &#187; The Motel</title>
		<link>http://marcydermansky.com/2005/12/11/new-york-times-editors-choice-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>jürgen fauth&#8217;s muckworld &#187; The Motel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcydermansky.com/wordpress/2006/12/11/new-york-times-editors-choice-pick/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] In my experience, pitching anything as &#8220;coming of age&#8221; story is instant death. Somehow, it reeks of overly familiar stuff that everybody is supposed to have moved past long ago. Bildungsroman has a slightly better ring to it, especially if you can hyphenate it somehow, but the idea is the same: teenagers learning about responsibility and identity and love and sex and death&#8211;ugh, right? Well, no. As Frederick Barthelme once told me, semi-cryptically: &#8220;It&#8217;s a rug.&#8221; Categorizing something doesn&#8217;t fully describe it yet, and it certainly doesn&#8217;t imply a value judgment. Most stories owe a huge debt to the major arcana and Joseph Campbell&#8217;s monomyth, but that doesn&#8217;t make them bad rugs, dig? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my experience, pitching anything as &#8220;coming of age&#8221; story is instant death. Somehow, it reeks of overly familiar stuff that everybody is supposed to have moved past long ago. Bildungsroman has a slightly better ring to it, especially if you can hyphenate it somehow, but the idea is the same: teenagers learning about responsibility and identity and love and sex and death&#8211;ugh, right? Well, no. As Frederick Barthelme once told me, semi-cryptically: &#8220;It&#8217;s a rug.&#8221; Categorizing something doesn&#8217;t fully describe it yet, and it certainly doesn&#8217;t imply a value judgment. Most stories owe a huge debt to the major arcana and Joseph Campbell&#8217;s monomyth, but that doesn&#8217;t make them bad rugs, dig? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

